Dr Thomas Beddoes: chemistry, medicine, and the perils of democracy.

نویسنده

  • Trevor H Levere
چکیده

Beddoes lectured on chemistry at Oxford in the years that included the French Revolution, the Terror, and the outbreak of war with France, as well as the success in France of the chemical revolution. The very public dispute between Edmund Burke and Joseph Priestley meant that the latter's study of different kinds of air was politically tainted. Beddoes's democratic beliefs and his support for the new chemistry of Lavoisier meant that as chemist and physician he had to deal with complaints that he was potentially seditious and pro-French. His medical theories, allied to pneumatic chemistry and building on the work of Priestley, were accordingly suspect. In spite of that, he became the physician and friend to several members of the Lunar Society of Birmingham and to members of their family, and they in return became his patrons. His collaboration with James Watt was crucial for his development of pneumatic medicine. The full extent of Lunar patronage, and especially that of James Keir and Thomas Wedgwood, has hitherto not been recognized, but it was the concealed scale of that patronage that made possible the execution of Beddoes's ambitious programme of treatment and research.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Thomas Beddoes MD, 1760–1808

DOROTHY A. STANSFIELD, Thomas Beddoes MD, 1760-1808, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1984, 8vo, pp. xx, 306, Dfl.140.00/$54.00. Thomas Beddoes has been the subject of intermittent study, manifested through a succession of more or less specialized papers, mostly on his pneumatic studies. His political involvements have also been noticed, but usually in ways that do not reveal any substantial connexion betwee...

متن کامل

Progress of the Medical Sciences

some new remedy, with a scientific name too unwieldy for ordinary use, and too often a value inversely as the length of its chemical formula, it is a novelty to note the reviving reputation of a long-known simple chemical element. Oxygen is not now for the first time associated with medicine. The most important of all the elements was not likely to escape the notice of the inquiring scientific ...

متن کامل

Dr Thomas Beddoes and James Watt: preparatory work 1794-96 for the Bristol Pneumatic Institute.

PART I. BEDDOES' THEORIES, HIS WORK, THE INTERVENTION OF JAMES WATT In 1793, Dr Thomas Beddoes moved from Oxford, where he had won a considerable reputation as Chemical Reader, and established himself as a physician in Bristol. This was not an easy period for him, since he had a reputation for being an active sympathizer with the French Revolution and was known to the Home Office as the author ...

متن کامل

Stanley Cobb. A builder of the neurosciences

DOROTHY A. STANSFIELD, Thomas Beddoes MD, 1760-1808, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1984, 8vo, pp. xx, 306, Dfl.140.00/$54.00. Thomas Beddoes has been the subject of intermittent study, manifested through a succession of more or less specialized papers, mostly on his pneumatic studies. His political involvements have also been noticed, but usually in ways that do not reveal any substantial connexion betwee...

متن کامل

Rheumatic fever in America and Britain: a biological, epidemiological, and medical history

This is a book swarming with anachronism among which are a complaint about bad spelling allegedly common at the time (p. 9), the observations that Darwin's work reveals his potential to be the "first male feminist" (p. 167) (a particular obsession to which King-Hele often returns), that Darwin was "ahead of his time" in seizing on the rapid growth rates of cannabis which, ifmade into paper, mig...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Notes and records of the Royal Society of London

دوره 63 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009